You have shut me down in no way and have only been wrong the entire argument, including with the principles of stalling and flight itself. I never said he stalled coming out of the bank, and he executed the bank with plenty of speed coming into it due to the straight trajectory at which he entered the valley. Not to mention the loss of speed is quite apparent by looking at the cameras attached to him, not the stationary camera. Your argument is invalid because you’ve only argued against mine.
if ur saying my arguement is invalid because ive only argued against urs, wouldnt that be the same for u? and again tell me how ive been wrong the entire time? the “principles” of stalling and flight that I have provided are wrong? tell me how they are wrong? sorry to disappoint but ive already shut down ur arguement.
You’ve shut down my argument in no way. In fact, I’m still going strong. You’re the only one who needs to step away from the true debate to something else unrelated. Though the paragraph on stalling that you copied and pasted from the internet was a correct form of a stall, it’s not the only stall, like you claim it to be. In fact, it’s the only stall not being discussed in this debate. Furthermore, what you have stated has also been wrong, such as “he can’t stall” and numerous others.
lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the “true” debate? how is it the “only” stall not being discussed in this “debate?” flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut “numerous” others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.
lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the “true” debate? how is it the “only” stall not being discussed in this “debate?” flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut “numerous” others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.
A wing does not need to be at a critical angle of attack in order to stall. He’s wearing a wing-suit, remember? His stall speed is actually extremely high, meaning a stall is very capable.
Untrue statements:
-”In order to stall u need to go upwards in a 15 degree angle.”
-”wing-suits have better maneuverability because they have less mass compared to a jet.”
-”u first need to lose the lift which means ur going in an upward motion”
I just copied the first three that I found.
I am curious where you get your knowledge of stalling? I saw in previous comments that stall occurs at 15 degrees angle of attack, which is not often the case (if you have ever seen an airplane perform a loop, you can see that stall does not occur, even when the airplane is upside down). Stall depends on several things: air density, angle of attack, airspeed, shape of the airfoil, and even the roughness of the material the airfoil is made of. You cannot strictly determine when a wing will stall.
You have shut me down in no way and have only been wrong the entire argument, including with the principles of stalling and flight itself. I never said he stalled coming out of the bank, and he executed the bank with plenty of speed coming into it due to the straight trajectory at which he entered the valley. Not to mention the loss of speed is quite apparent by looking at the cameras attached to him, not the stationary camera. Your argument is invalid because you’ve only argued against mine.
if ur saying my arguement is invalid because ive only argued against urs, wouldnt that be the same for u? and again tell me how ive been wrong the entire time? the “principles” of stalling and flight that I have provided are wrong? tell me how they are wrong? sorry to disappoint but ive already shut down ur arguement.
You’ve shut down my argument in no way. In fact, I’m still going strong. You’re the only one who needs to step away from the true debate to something else unrelated. Though the paragraph on stalling that you copied and pasted from the internet was a correct form of a stall, it’s not the only stall, like you claim it to be. In fact, it’s the only stall not being discussed in this debate. Furthermore, what you have stated has also been wrong, such as “he can’t stall” and numerous others.
lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the “true” debate? how is it the “only” stall not being discussed in this “debate?” flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut “numerous” others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.
lmfao ur arguement is going strong? i need to step away from the “true” debate? how is it the “only” stall not being discussed in this “debate?” flying at a speed that that exceeds 100mph, yes he cant stall, also because his angle of attack isnt critical, and wut “numerous” others that i have stated is wrong? please indulge me. I have indeed shut down ur arguement.
A wing does not need to be at a critical angle of attack in order to stall. He’s wearing a wing-suit, remember? His stall speed is actually extremely high, meaning a stall is very capable.
Untrue statements:
-”In order to stall u need to go upwards in a 15 degree angle.”
-”wing-suits have better maneuverability because they have less mass compared to a jet.”
-”u first need to lose the lift which means ur going in an upward motion”
I just copied the first three that I found.
pretty insane, good shit man
KIWI!
How you stop?
I am curious where you get your knowledge of stalling? I saw in previous comments that stall occurs at 15 degrees angle of attack, which is not often the case (if you have ever seen an airplane perform a loop, you can see that stall does not occur, even when the airplane is upside down). Stall depends on several things: air density, angle of attack, airspeed, shape of the airfoil, and even the roughness of the material the airfoil is made of. You cannot strictly determine when a wing will stall.
lands on his feet like batman
The first on is the Matterhorn or no?
Hey man can you film something like this in 3D? It would be amazing!
you have 3d videos on his channel.